Skip to main content
LITT LITIGATION ANALYTICS

See the whole matter — before you file, and before they do.

For litigators and in-house counsel. Pre-litigation, LITT ingests 10,000+ documents of every type and assembles a brief-ready dossier; post-litigation, it models the bench, the judge, the opposing counsel and the counterparty — so you walk in knowing the matter cold.

Sign up free
Built for
Pre-litigation analytics

From 10,000 documents to a case.

Before a notice goes out, LITT ingests every email, chat, agreement, image, scan and call recording, reconstructs the timeline, surfaces the decisive evidence, maps the parties and estimates exposure — assembling a brief-ready dossier for litigators and in-house counsel in days, not months.

Pre-litigation · from chaos to a case
0 documents indexed
01Unstructured. Scattered. Unreadable.
14file formats
9custodians
~38%need OCR / transcribe
1,342duplicates
0structure
FW_RE_delivery delay.eml
Re: Payment?? (2).msgduplicate
WhatsApp Chat - Promoter.txt
Contract_FINAL_v3_signed.pdf
MSA_scan.pdfneeds OCR
IMG_2241.HEICneeds OCR
ledger_q2_v2.xlsx
vendor_call_rec.m4atranscribe
annexure_unsigned.pdfpassword
whiteboard_photo.jpghandwritten
Slack #procurement.json
FWD: revised terms.eml
invoice_4471.pdf
Screenshot 2025-03-14.png
payments(reconciled).csvduplicate
voicemail.mp3
DRAFT_settlement_v2.docx
signed_page12.jpgneeds OCR
Teams_export_legal.txt
GST_notice_redacted.pdfpassword
No team can read, de-duplicate and connect this before the limitation clock runs.
LITT structures it
02One pipeline turns the pile into structured facts.
01
Ingest
Every file, every custodian
0
raw files
02
OCR & transcribe
Scans, images & audio → text
0
converted
03
De-duplicate
Versions, forwards, near-copies
0
removed
04
Classify & extract
Entities, dates, clauses, amounts
0
facts pulled
05
Link & resolve
Cross-reference into one chain
1
timeline
06
Privilege & PII
Flag, wall off, redact
0
walled off
Classified intoEmails4,210Chats3,180Agreements1,640Images920Sheets410Audio122
Synthesised into
03One single source of truth.
Matter dossier · every fact cited to source
Acme Industries v. Promoter Group
Commercial dispute · pre-action assessment
0%ready
Decisive evidence surfaced
Email · 14 Mar 2025
Vendor admits the delivery delay in writing
from email #3,481
High
WhatsApp · 2 May 2025
Promoter promises to clear payment by Q2
from chat thread #112
High
MSA · Clause 11.2
Liquidated damages @ ₹50k per day of delay
OCR'd from MSA_scan.pdf
Medium
Case at a glance
₹ 18–0 Cr
Exposure range
0 · 9
Entities · custodians
0
Privileged · walled off
Reconstructed timeline
MSA signed
Delay notice
Part-payment
Dispute
Termination
10,000+ documents · any format · privilege & PII auto-handled · every fact cited to source · a case picture in days, not months.
Ingest any format

Emails, chats, agreements, invoices, images, scans and audio — across every custodian — OCR'd and transcribed.

Reconstruct the facts

One chronology with the decisive documents pinned to each fact and cited to source — ready to drop into pleadings.

Strength & exposure

A case-readiness score and a quantified exposure range, so you know the merits before you commit to litigate.

Privilege & discovery-safe

Privileged communications flagged and walled off, PII redacted, every step logged for discovery.

Post-litigation analytics

Model the bench, before the hearing.

Once a matter is live, LITT learns from every concluded case — modelling your forum, the likely judge, the opposing counsel and the counterparty entity together.

Every disposed matter across India's commercial courts — every reasoning pattern, every silent doctrinal shift, every panel composition — examined as data. LITT models the bench, the opposing counsel, and the counterparty entity together, producing the kind of pre-litigation intelligence that has historically only existed in the heads of the most senior litigators.

Active matter · pre-litigation analytics
Acme Industries v Promoter Group
Oppression & mismanagement · s.241–242
CP NO. 217/2026 · Pre-petition
Recommended forum
Nat. Co. Law Tribunal · NCLT-MUM
Recommended over Bombay HC · cost-of-capital edge
Outcome confidence
Petitioner favoured
HIGH CONFIDENCE · 88%
MODEL · ACTIVE
Bench intelligence
NCLT-MUM · Commercial Bench
Modelled across last 24 months of dispositions
287
Petitions last 24mo
14.2 mo
Median disposition
12%
Reversed at NCLAT
Remedy distribution · this matter type
Buy-out direction
0%
Investigation order
0%
Constitution of board
0%
Aligned precedents
Tata Consultancy v CyrusAligned · construction
Shanti Prasad v KalingaAligned · oppression test
Hanuman Prasad v ROCDistinguished · facts
Predictive layer
Outcome & argument modelling
Fact-pattern matched against 47K dispositions
Predicted outcome distribution
Petitioner success
0%
Settlement during pleadings
0%
Respondent success
0%
Argument-strength scoring
Oppression · s.241
0%
Mismanagement · s.242(1)
0%
Related-party transactions
0%
Diversion of business / RPT
0%
Expected timeline · months
Petition · admission· 3mo
Pleadings · reply· 4mo
Evidence· 3mo
Final hearing· 4.2mo
TOTAL · 0.0 months to judgment
Estimated settlement range
₹ 32 Cr – 78 Cr
0
Dispositions indexed across jurisdictions
0%
Prediction accuracy on outcome class
0 days
Median to full fact-pattern match
0
Benches modelled · across India
10,000+
documents ingested · any format
6
source types — email to audio
47,000
dispositions modelled
92%
outcome-class prediction
DPDP-aligned·India data residency·Privilege & PII auto-handled·Decision Trace on every finding

Know the matter, end to end.

Build the case from your documents before you file, and model the bench once you do — one platform, built for Indian litigation.

Sign up free